Logo

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Last Updated: 29.06.2025 06:52

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

Just in the last 5 years:

Walkoff caps ‘unreal 24 hours’ for Mariners’ Cole Young - Seattle Sports

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

Why is Meghan Markle's Hollywood presence fading despite her royal status and Netflix deal?

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

Let’s just make it real clear:

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

The Best Father's Day Gift Ideas for Every Type of Dad - IGN

Russia can stop this any time.

Thank you.

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

Braves Place Chris Sale On 15-Day IL With Ribcage Fracture - MLB Trade Rumors

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

Who is Meghan Markle and why is she so controversial on the Internet?

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

Brave x Junction demo now available - Gematsu

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

Early AI investor Elad Gil finds his next big bet: AI-powered rollups - TechCrunch

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

Increase in Ariane 6 launch cadence could take several years - SpaceNews

What’s next?

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

Why do women change that much more with age?